Special Awards In Pictures

-ULSU Questions Decision Over CoC
By Reuben Sei Waylaun
The Supreme Court of Liberia continues to receive litany of whippings since it ruled against the Code of Conduct in favor of Messrs Harrison Karnwea of the Liberty Party and Jeremiah Sulunteh of the Alternative National Congress who took exception to the National Elections Commission’s (NEC) decision to reject them for not resigning their posts as enshrined in the CoC.

Court House 9x6The University of Liberia Students Union (ULSU) is the latest entity to speak strongly against the Supreme Court’s ruling, wondering why the highest court of the land decided to act the way it acted over the CoC ahead of the crucial pending presidential and legislative elections. Jerome D. Bernard, President of ULSU, said it was unclear why the Court qualified those they called violators of the CoC.
Unmatched public criticism recently marred the clearing of Harrison Karnwea, running mate to Cllr. Charles Walker Brumskine of the Liberty Party and Jeremiah Sulunteh, running mate to Alexander Cummings of the Alternative National Congress and others to contest the impending elections when it was visually cleared that they were in violation of the CoC.
Prior to the ruling that rendered the COC invertebrate, the Supreme Court declared it a legal instrument after a complaint of scrutiny was filed by Serena Mappy-Polson, Superintendent of Bong County over its legality.
According to Bernard, to allow contestants to contest despite resigning less than two years undercut the very basis for which the code of conduct was enacted into law.
Section 5.1 and 5.2 of the National Code of Conduct clearly stipulates the standards that must be followed by appointed officials of the Government of Liberia regarding their desires to participate in elections conducted by the Republic, standards previously regarded by the Supreme Court as legal. Bernard indicated that the Supreme Court should be aware that there is no provision in the laws for a middle ground between eligibility and ineligibility and between violation and disqualification.
“If the Supreme Court is saying that a half-way compliance with the laws as indicated in Karnwea vs NEC is not egregious enough to warrant denying a Liberian a participation in an election, what then would the court say?” Bernard questioned.

The largest student grouping reminded the Supreme Court of its previous endorsement of the law as legal in which it vowed to ensure its applications.
“Laws are not made to appease everyone at the same time. But when a statue is interpreted, the first and most important rule is the dealing with the statue must follow the statue’s plain language,” he said.
ULSU said when a legal opinion becomes hermaphrodite as in the case of the Supreme Court ruling, it creates a room for a conflict. “Those who become victims of the law might lose confidence in the court thereby resorting to violence or noncompliance activities intended to undermine the legitimacy of the system,” he added.
Meanwhile, ULSU said it wouldn’t endorse any candidate because as a responsible student government, it will organize a debate among presidential candidates as a means to sell their platforms to the students of the University of Liberia.

Who we are

We dedicate time, energy, resources in the people who go out for the news.  We invest  in the  talents  and potentials of  the   professionals.  Basically, we focus on   capacity  building of our  people so that they can be prepared for the challenges ahead. We are the light for all. We  focus on the needs of our readers and bring to them new  level of  innovation that inspires them.

What we do

New Republic  tells the accurate stories as they come.  Investigate, capture moments and tell it as it comes. We bring to readers what  is news, what is informative and what is touching to add value to their business and  time. Importantly,  we do the job as our clients and readers would like to see. Moreover,  value  is added to whatever that we do to enhance productivity and longevity.

How we do it

We dedicate time, energy, resources in the people who go out for the news.  We invest  in the  talents  and potentials of  the   professionals. We look at the issues that make the news and bring  it to  our readers. The way of working is very unique and professional. Looking beyond the news is always our aim. Knowing what is behind the news is  crucial in all that we do.

When we do it

We do it just it  as it comes.  We get it out in a more  balanced and professional way as expected by the professionals  straight to  our readers. We do it at a time when  others do   not have it in mind. While others are searching, thinking, that is the time we release it to  our  readers. So, it comes at a privileged time where they will make  an  opinion on relevant issues.